Talk:RuneScape Fan Fiction:Request for bureaucracy (community nomination)

Deciding who has earned the Admin/'crat -ship.

Standard procedure has always been a majority but that was with all individual applications submitted by those wanting to be admins. (Look up Requests for Adminship) Of course, there are many users here who would love to be admins but don't quite deserve it yet, but an easily play the voting game by asking others for nominations and promising to vote for each other. I'm not saying anyone has started this yet but I've seen someone come pretty close to a You Vote for Me I Vote for You scheme.

So, to try to fix this, what should the PASS/FAIL barrier be? +5, +4, or perhaps +3 in votes? Of course, Support would be a +1, Neutral would be a +0 and against would be a -1. So speaking, Hyper86 would currently have a +3 with three supports, no neutrals and no againsts.

Also, I will be on the look-out for that Voting scheme I said before and I will definitely vote down anyone that does so, to at least attempt to level the playing field. Anyone else supporting me in this please back me up if I find evidence saying they used this scheme.

Biggest Question: What number does a candidate have to reach to become an admin? My suggestion is +4 and I want two supports before that becomes official.

Thank you for your time,

--Berus 21:13, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

I think it should be 4+, and I also have another suggestion. I think whoever comes in second should become an admin. Whoever is voted as a Bureaucrat can't be here all the time. However, we have a very small community, so maybe one is enough? Coroxn Talk 23:35, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

I think we should have just one for the beginning. Later, we can decide to have one or two more if he/she needs help. 19:57, May 30, 2010 (UTC)

No! No, no, no; No, no, absolutely no! Wrong! Setting a vote limit or threshold is totally wrong! The Wiki is not a Democracy! Is a consensus! No vote threshold. Only whenever we feel that the user has deserved it, taking in account the commentaries of the voters. NO vote threshold, for heaven's sake! 13:48, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Voting duration
How long will the voting time be? 14:07, June 5, 2010 (UTC)

Nobody knows... By the looks of things, the nomination won't be closed anytime soon... 110.175.53.174 06:20, June 26, 2010 (UTC)