Talk:RuneScape Fan Fiction:Request for bureaucracy (community nomination)

Deciding who has earned the Admin/'crat -ship.

Standard procedure has always been a majority but that was with all invididual applications submitted by those wanting to be admins. (Look up Requests for Adminship) Of course, there are many users here who would love to be admins but don't quite deserve it yet, but an easily play the voting game by asking others for nominations and promising to vote for each other. I'm not saying anyone has started this yet but I've seen someone come pretty close to a You Vote for Me I Vote for You scheme.

So, to try to fix this, what should the PASS/FAIL barrier be? +5, +4, or perhaps +3 in votes? Of course, Support would be a +1, Neutral would be a +0 and against would be a -1. So speaking, Hyper86 would currently have a +3 with three supports, no neutrals and no againsts.

Also, I will be on the look-out for that Voting scheme I said before and I will definately vote down anyone that does so, to at least attempt to level the playing field. Anyone else supporting me in this please back me up if I find evidence saying they used this scheme.

Biggest Question: What number does a candidate have to reach to become an admin? My suggestion is +4 and I want two supports before that becomes official.

Thank you for your time,

--PAT 21:13, May 28, 2010 (UTC)